Ground, Grounding and SWR

Many hams believe that “grounding” is essential to antenna performance—but this idea is often misunderstood. While safety grounding is critical, the concept of an “RF ground” is a myth. There is no universal RF reference point in free space. What truly matters, especially in unbalanced antenna systems, is the presence of a proper current return path—usually a radial system or counterpoise. Ground rods, while important for lightning protection, do not help stabilize impedance or lower SWR. This article clarifies these distinctions and explains the real mechanisms that influence antenna performance.

There is a common misconception in amateur radio that "grounding" improves antenna performance. In reality, the idea of an "RF ground" is misleading—there is no such thing as a universal RF reference point in free space. For unbalanced antennas like verticals and end-feds, what matters is providing a proper return path for current—typically through radials or a counterpoise. Simply driving a ground rod into the earth does not create a return path for radio frequencies and has negligible effect on SWR or efficiency.

Ground rods serve a different purpose: safety. They help dissipate static charges and provide a low-impedance path for fault currents or lightning. But they do not provide a meaningful path for RF return currents. This article clears up these myths and explains how radials, chokes, and return paths—not grounding rods—determine SWR stability and antenna efficiency.

⚠️ Note: To prevent ground loops when low-impedance bonding to the protective earth of your home is not possible, maintain a minimum distance of 15–20 meters between independent ground rods or ground systems. This reduces circulating current and potential differences during lightning events or high RF power operation.

1. Antenna Types and Their Return Path Needs

a. Unbalanced Antennas

Vertical Antennas:

  • Vertical antennas need a proper return path for RF currents. This path is provided not by a ground rod, but by a network of radials or an elevated counterpoise.
  • Ground rods offer a safety connection (e.g., for lightning), but do not serve as a return path for RF.
  • The number and length of radials directly affect antenna efficiency, feedpoint impedance, and SWR stability.

End-Fed Antennas:

  • End-fed designs require a return path to stabilize the feedpoint impedance. This is typically provided by a counterpoise or via common-mode currents on the coax if no choke is present.
  • Without this return path, RF will seek out any conductive structure (including your coax shield or equipment), leading to erratic behavior and high SWR.
  • An intentionally high-impedance path, such as a vertical stainless-steel (RVS316) rod, can sometimes help suppress current flow along unintended paths. This has nothing to do with safety grounding—its purpose is purely functional in deterring RF return current via undesired routes.

b. Balanced Antennas

Dipoles and Similar Designs:

  • Dipoles are balanced by nature and do not require any external reference to earth for RF operation. However, because they are floating (not DC grounded), it's important to add static bleed resistors or protection circuits connected to a low-impedance path to ground for safety and static discharge control.

2. Return Path's Role in Impedance Matching

Unbalanced Antennas:

  • In antennas like end-feds and verticals, the return path—not a ground rod—is critical. Without sufficient radials or a proper counterpoise, the feedpoint impedance is unstable, leading to poor matching and high SWR.
  • Environmental factors like soil moisture only affect performance when radials are present and make contact with the ground. A single copper ground rod has minimal influence on impedance and serves solely as a safety measure, not a functional RF component.

Feedline Effects:

  • A feedline without proper common-mode suppression may radiate or interact with nearby objects, creating unpredictable impedance variations.

3. Techniques to Improve SWR

a. Vertical Antennas

Radials:

  • Install ground-mounted or elevated radials to create an efficient current return path.
  • The more radials used, the lower the loss and the more stable the SWR.
  • Ground rods are only for safety and provide negligible benefit for signal return.

Vertical Dipoles:

  • Since they are balanced, vertical dipoles do not require radials or grounding for RF performance.
  • Lightning protection grounding remains recommended.

Static Protection:

  • Use static bleed resistors or DC grounding to safely drain static buildup.

b. End-Fed Antennas

Choke Balun:

  • A 1:1 current choke near the feedpoint blocks RF from flowing on the outside of the coax shield.
  • For half-wave designs, 0.05λ from the transformer is often optimal.

Feedline Grounding:

  • Grounding the coax shield just after the choke or at shack entry can help minimize unwanted current paths. Preferably, this is done using a high-impedance ground rod—such as a stainless steel rod—which discourages strong common-mode current buildup without offering a low-resistance return path. Strategically placing such high-impedance grounds every half-wavelength along long coax runs can help suppress common-mode resonances and reduce received noise levels, particularly in sensitive RX setups.

Static Discharge:

  • Install a DC path to ground via a resistor or inductor to prevent voltage buildup—especially important in antennas that are not DC-grounded by design, such as dipoles, quarter-wave verticals, and similar open-ended structures. This helps discharge static electricity and protects both equipment and operators.

c. Station Grounding

  • Ground your station to meet safety requirements and to help stabilize voltage references for connected equipment. While it has no direct effect on RF interference, it is essential for lightning protection, electrical safety, and proper functioning of some transceiver and power supply designs.

4. Soil Conductivity and Performance

High Conductivity Ground:

  • Moist, mineral-rich soil can improve performance when radials are in contact with it.

Low Conductivity Ground:

  • Dry or rocky soil limits radial effectiveness. However, even in poor soil conditions, a well-designed radial system remains essential for establishing a proper return path for unbalanced antennas.

5. Practical Cases

Vertical Without Radials:

  • High SWR caused by lack of a proper return path.
  • Adding multiple radials brings the impedance closer to 50 ohms and improves performance.

End-Fed Without Choke:

  • Coax shield carries RF, destabilising the system.
  • Adding a choke and/or counterpoise stabilizes the system.

6. Important Notes

Static Risks:

  • Use DC bleed paths on wire antennas to safely dissipate charge from wind or storms.

Ground Rod Limitations:

  • Ground rods are essential for lightning protection and safety, but they do not provide a current return path for RF.
  • Use radials or counterpoises to complete the circuit for unbalanced antennas.
  • One exception is the use of a high-impedance ground rod, such as stainless steel. While it does not conduct RF effectively, it can serve as a useful common-mode current blocker along the coax shield. This technique is particularly valuable in end-fed antenna setups, where it may also function as a high-impedance counterpoise to suppress unwanted RF currents.

7. Summary and Key Takeaways

  • Ground rods are for safety, not for RF performance.
  • Verticals and end-feds need radials or counterpoise wires to establish a stable current path.
  • The idea of an "RF ground" is a myth—return paths matter, not proximity to earth.
  • Chokes, radials, and proper feedline treatment are key to SWR and system reliability.

Interested in more technical content like this? Subscribe to our notification list — we only send updates when new articles or blogs are published: https://listmonk.rf.guru/subscription/form

Questions or experiences to share? Feel free to contact RF.Guru or join our feedback group!

Written by Joeri Van Dooren, ON6URE – RF, electronics and software engineer, complex platform and antenna designer. Founder of RF.Guru. An expert in active and passive antennas, high-power RF transformers, and custom RF solutions, he has also engineered telecom and broadcast hardware, including set-top boxes, transcoders, and E1/T1 switchboards. His expertise spans high-power RF, embedded systems, digital signal processing, and complex software platforms, driving innovation in both amateur and professional communications industries.