Common Misconceptions in Ham Radio
Amateur radio is a field where technical concepts often get simplified for ease of understanding. However, oversimplification can sometimes lead to misconceptions that persist within the community. Many common beliefs about antennas, grounding, power, and propagation are based on partial truths, outdated knowledge, or misunderstandings of complex RF principles. This article clarifies some of the most frequently misinterpreted statements in ham radio.
Common Misconceptions in Ham Radio
My antenna is perfectly matched because my SWR is 1:1.
- A low SWR does not necessarily mean efficient radiation. A dummy load has an SWR of 1:1 but radiates nothing. Coaxial losses can also mask mismatch.
A 50-ohm antenna is always the best choice for my radio.
- Most radios are designed for 50 Ω, but antennas rarely are. Matching networks (baluns/ununs) allow efficient transfer from the antenna’s natural impedance.
My RF ground must be connected to an earth ground to work properly.
- RF grounding differs from DC grounding. Counterpoises, radials, or elevated planes often outperform a single ground rod.
- DC grounding, however, is essential for safety and lightning protection. For non‑DC‑grounded antennas like dipoles or ¼λ/⅝λ verticals, always use a bleeder resistor to drain static buildup safely.
The higher the power, the better the signal.
- Power helps, but antenna efficiency, propagation, and QRM are often more decisive. Beyond a point, extra watts bring little gain.
- More power also raises I²R losses, stressing feedlines and transformers. Improving efficiency is often more effective than boosting watts.
You should always use a transmatch (tuner) to match the antenna.
- A transmatch protects the radio by transforming impedance at the shack. It does not improve antenna efficiency.
- Most modern radios tolerate SWR up to ~2.5:1 before reducing output.
Balanced antennas don’t need a balun.
- Perfectly balanced antennas exist only in textbooks. In real life, surroundings cause imbalance and common‑mode currents appear.
- A current balun is essential not only to suppress common‑mode noise, but also to ensure that return currents in transmission are properly handled, keeping the feed system stable and efficient.
A horizontal antenna is always better for DX than a vertical.
- Performance depends on frequency, ground, and height. A dipole at low height often radiates high‑angle NVIS, while a vertical provides low‑angle DX potential.
- Example: on 20 m (λ ≈ 14 m), a dipole at 7 m (~½λ) works well. On 40 m (λ ≈ 28 m), the same dipole at 7 m (~¼λ) is NVIS, not DX.
A quarter-wave vertical doesn’t need radials.
- Ground‑mounted ¼λ verticals are lossy without radials. Radials minimize earth resistance and improve efficiency.
- Alternative: vertical dipoles (including off‑center‑fed) provide a self‑contained return path without a ground radial field.
A longer antenna is always better.
- It’s not the absolute wire length that matters, but its relationship to wavelength (λ). Both overly long and overly short wires can perform poorly.
- Too long: unwanted lobes, poor directivity, narrow usable bandwidth. Too short: high reactance, low radiation resistance, and high losses in matching networks.
- Predictable ratios (¼λ, ½λ, ⅝λ) generally yield stable, efficient patterns. Non‑harmonic lengths often produce erratic or inefficient lobes.
Dummy loads can be used to test antennas.
- A dummy load is for transmitters, not antennas. It absorbs RF but does not radiate.
- You can use one to test coax loss or check for faulty connectors.
Quick Reference — SWR vs Efficiency vs Loss
| SWR | Transmitter Safety | Efficiency Impact |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0–1.5:1 | Perfectly safe | Negligible loss |
| 2:1 | Safe for most radios | Minimal additional loss |
| 3:1 | Borderline — most radios cut power | Feedline & transformer loss rises |
| >5:1 | Protection circuits trigger | Significant heating & mismatch |
Note: SWR reflects mismatch, not efficiency. A 1:1 dummy load proves the point — perfect SWR, zero radiation.
All coax is the same.
- Not true. Loss varies widely: RG‑58 is lossy at UHF, while LMR‑400 is far better. Choosing coax impacts efficiency as much as antenna choice.
You need a big tower and a beam to work the world.
- Beams help, but many DXers succeed with dipoles, doublets, loops, or end‑feds.
- Improving your receive system often beats raw TX power for weak‑signal work.
End-fed antennas don’t need a counterpoise.
- An end‑fed is effectively half a dipole. Without a counterpoise, the feedline radiates and distorts the pattern.
- If choking is weak, add a proper counterpoise or a 1:1 choke ~0.05λ down the line.
An open-wire feedline is always better than coax.
- Open‑wire has lower loss but practical routing is difficult. With a proper balun and transmatch, it’s excellent for doublets.
- A hybrid of coax + open‑wire often balances efficiency and convenience.
If I can hear them, I can work them.
- Not always. Their antenna, noise, and propagation differ. RX ≠ TX.
- If you can work everything you hear, your receive setup may be noisy. Shielded RX antennas uncover hidden weak signals.
Higher SWR means my power is lost in heat.
- High SWR creates standing waves, not total loss. Much power is still radiated; extra loss occurs mainly in feedline and transformers.
Mini-FAQ
- Does 1:1 SWR mean efficiency? — No, it only means a match. A dummy load is 1:1 but radiates nothing.
- Do balanced antennas exist? — Only in theory. Real-world antennas always benefit from a balun to control common‑mode and return currents.
- Do verticals always need radials? — ¼λ types do. Alternatives like vertical dipoles use a built‑in return path.
- Is longer always better? — No. Length vs wavelength matters; both too long and too short can perform poorly.
- Will more power always help? — Not if your antenna is lossy. Fix efficiency before adding watts.
Interested in more technical content? https://shop.rf.guru/pages/subscribe
Questions or experiences to share? https://shop.rf.guru/pages/contact