HF Current Balun Transformer: The Last Two Antennas Where They Belong
Current Balun Transformer (CBT): when it’s the right tool (and when it isn’t)
For decades, current balun transformers (CBTs)—impedance-transforming current-mode baluns—were marketed as universal “antenna balancers.” In practice, very few HF antennas are truly balanced in the real world. The ground, the feedline, and nearby objects break symmetry. That’s why the day-to-day workhorse for most HF installations is a 1:1 current choke that kills common‑mode current. A current balun transformer is the right choice only in specific cases where you also need a fixed, monoband impedance transformation.
- 1:1 current choke — Common‑mode choke. No transformation; forces equal/opposite currents in a balanced load and keeps RF off the outside of the coax.
- Current balun transformer (CBT) — A current‑type (Guanella‑style) transformer that both enforces current balance and provides a fixed ratio (e.g., 2:1, 4:1).
- Voltage balun — Ruthroff‑style. Provides a ratio but does not control common‑mode well on reactive/misaligned loads. Avoid for general HF antennas.
Where a Current Balun Transformer still makes sense (monoband)
In HF ham radio there are really two monoband antenna families where a CBT often fits well:
- Folded dipoles (single band) — Typically ~300 Ω at resonance → use a 4:1 current balun transformer at the feedpoint. Follow with a 1:1 current choke if needed to keep the feedline quiet.
-
Full‑wave loops (single band; horizontal or delta) — Often ~100–120 Ω at resonance. Two viable paths:
- 2:1 current balun transformer at the feedpoint, or
- Feedline transform: a ¼‑wave section of 75 Ω coax to step ~100–120 Ω toward 50 Ω, then a 1:1 current choke.
The keyword is monoband. Off the design frequency, any fixed transformation (CBT or transmission‑line section) goes off‑ratio and can run hot.
Current Balun Transformer vs feedline transformation
- Option A — Current Balun Transformer (CBT): Compact and tidy at the feedpoint. Provides balance and a fixed ratio. Ferrite loss and core heating rise as you move off resonance or at QRO.
- Option B — Feedline transformation (monoband loops): Use a short ¼‑wave of 75 Ω coax cut for the band to transform ~100–120 Ω to near 50 Ω; then add a 1:1 current choke to suppress common‑mode.
- Length (electrical ¼‑wave): L ≈ (c / f) × VF / 4. Example at 7.1 MHz with VF = 0.85 → L ≈ 10.6 m × 0.85 ≈ 9.0 m.
- Where to place the choke: After the 75 Ω section, put a 1:1 current choke (~0.05–0.10 λ from the antenna feedpoint works well) to keep RF off the feedline.
- Power handling: The 75 Ω section’s power rating scales with the coax; it runs cool. The choke must be QRO‑rated for your duty cycle.
- Loss & heat: A CBT uses ferrite and can dissipate heat under mismatch or high power; a properly cut ¼‑wave coax section is low‑loss and runs cool.
- QRO headroom: Coax sections generally handle QRO better; CBTs are limited by core size, material, and temperature rise.
- Bandwidth: Both are narrow by design; the coax section holds its ratio precisely on the design band and doesn’t drift with heating.
- Common‑mode control: Neither replaces a choke. Always use a 1:1 current choke to keep the feedline quiet.
- Practicality: CBTs are compact and easy to mount at the feedpoint; feedline transforms need a measured section but can be more efficient at QRO.
Short version: a current balun transformer is the clean, compact fix when you need both balance and a fixed ratio on a single band. For monoband loops, a 75 Ω section + choke often delivers cooler, high‑power performance.
Where Current Balun Transformers don’t belong
- Off‑center‑fed dipoles (OCF): Feedpoint ~200 Ω and inherently unbalanced. Use a 4:1 unun for the match, then a 1:1 current choke placed ~0.05–0.10 λ down the line for common‑mode suppression. A 4:1 balun is misapplied here.
- End‑fed wires (EFHW, “random” wires): Unbalanced by definition. They require ununs (e.g., 49:1, 9:1) and a choke on the coax.
- Yagis and verticals: “Symmetric on paper” isn’t symmetric in the yard. A 1:1 current choke maintains pattern and keeps the feedline quiet.
Decision table for common HF antennas
| Antenna Type | Best Solution | Alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Folded Dipole (monoband) | 4:1 Current Balun Transformer at feedpoint (+ 1:1 choke if needed) | Balanced line to a tuner; or matching network |
| Full‑Wave Loop (monoband) | ¼‑wave 75 Ω section → 50 Ω + 1:1 choke | 2:1 Current Balun Transformer at feedpoint |
| Center‑Fed Dipole (multi‑band) | 1:1 Current Choke (plus tuner as needed) | CBT not needed; adds loss |
| OCF Dipole | 4:1 Unun + 1:1 Choke (0.05–0.10 λ) | 4:1 Balun is misapplied; can overheat |
| EFHW / Random Wire | Unun (49:1, 9:1) + Choke | Balun not applicable |
| Verticals / Yagis | 1:1 Current Choke | CBT not required |
Mini‑FAQ
- Is a current balun transformer obsolete? No. A CBT is still the right tool for monoband folded dipoles (4:1) and many full‑wave loops (2:1).
- Do I still need a 1:1 choke if I use a CBT? Usually yes. A CBT enforces balance at the feedpoint, but a 1:1 current choke keeps RF off the outside of the coax.
- Why choose feedline matching for loops? The ¼‑wave 75 Ω section is low‑loss and stays cool at QRO; then the choke cleans up common‑mode.
- How do I pick the CBT ratio? ~300 Ω folded dipole → 4:1 CBT. ~100–120 Ω loop → 2:1 CBT (or the 75 Ω section + choke approach).
- What about multi‑band wires? Use a 1:1 choke with a tuner (or an appropriate unun for EFHW/random‑wire). A CBT won’t fix imbalance there.
Interested in more technical content? Subscribe to our updates for deep‑dive RF articles and lab notes.
Questions or experiences to share? Contact RF.Guru — we’d love to hear from you.