EFHW Antennas: Inverted L vs Sloper/Flattop on 80/40M
End-Fed Half-Wave (EFHW) antennas remain one of the most flexible choices for 80 m and 40 m operation. Among the most common deployments are the Inverted L and the Sloper/Flattop. Each favors different propagation modes—low-angle DX or high-angle NVIS—depending on installation and height.
1. The Inverted L Configuration (EFHW8040)
The Inverted L combines a vertical wire section with a horizontal run. On 80/40 m this often means ~10–15 m vertical and the remainder horizontal, forming an “L”.
Advantages for DX
- Low‑angle launch: The vertical section enhances shallow elevation angles—ideal for intercontinental DX.
- Space efficiency: Less horizontal real estate; practical on smaller lots.
- Balanced coverage: With radials or a proper RF ground, it supports both DX and some regional work, leaning toward DX.
Advantages for NVIS
- The horizontal portion contributes to high‑angle energy on 80 m, especially when the horizontal leg is relatively low compared to wavelength.
Note: EFHW feedpoints are high‑voltage; use appropriate clearance and weatherproofing. Add a 1:1 common‑mode choke near the transformer to tame RF on the feedline.
Drawbacks
- Support needs: Requires a mast/tree for the vertical rise.
- Ground dependence: Efficiency strongly tied to radials or a decent ground spike/ground system.
2. The Sloper/Flattop Configuration
A Sloper angles downward from a high support; a Flattop runs horizontally between supports. Most of the wire is parallel to ground.
Advantages for DX
- Directional bias (Sloper): Tends to emphasize the downslope direction, useful when you want to favor a specific path.
- Simple deployment: Typically needs just two supports; quick portable setup.
Advantages for NVIS
- High‑angle coverage: Horizontal orientation promotes near‑vertical incidence—excellent for local/regional links on 80 m.
- Low‑height usability: Works well even at 5–10 m AGL, where NVIS is favored.
Installation height dominates behavior: lower flattops increase high‑angle energy (better NVIS), while higher flattops (≥0.5λ) begin to form lower‑angle lobes on 40 m.
Drawbacks
- Weaker low‑angle energy: Without a vertical section, low‑angle DX performance is typically reduced versus an Inverted L.
- Directional effects: Sloper bias may not line up with desired DX paths.
Performance Comparison
| Parameter | Inverted L | Sloper / Flattop |
|---|---|---|
| DX Suitability | Excellent (low‑angle) | Moderate (slope/height dependent) |
| NVIS Suitability | Moderate | Excellent (high‑angle) |
| Install Complexity | Higher (vertical support) | Lower (simple supports) |
| Pattern Bias | Near‑omni with good radials | Directional if sloped; flattop more uniform |
| Space Required | Compact (saves horizontal space) | Needs horizontal span between supports |
When to Choose Each
Choose the Inverted L (EFHW8040) if:
- DX is the priority (especially on 40 m).
- Horizontal space is tight but a vertical support is feasible.
- You can deploy radials or a dependable RF ground.
Choose the Sloper/Flattop if:
- Regional/NVIS coverage on 80 m is your main goal.
- You have room for a horizontal span and want a simpler install.
- You prefer fewer ground/radial requirements.
Conclusion
The Inverted L EFHW8040 tends to win on low‑angle DX, while Sloper/Flattop EFHWs excel for high‑angle NVIS and regional reliability. Match the geometry and height to your coverage goals on 80/40 m, and add proper choking and weatherproofing for stable results.
Mini-FAQ
- Do EFHWs still need a choke? — Yes. A 1:1 common‑mode choke near the transformer helps keep RF off the feedline and stabilizes patterns.
- Does an Inverted L need radials? — Strongly recommended. Even a few short radials or a good ground spike improves efficiency and tuning stability.
- Is a Sloper always directional? — It typically favors the downslope direction, but still provides usable coverage elsewhere.
Interested in more technical content? Subscribe to our updates for deep‑dive RF articles and lab notes.
Questions or experiences to share? Contact RF.Guru.