Multiband Fan Verticals and Why Mutual Coupling Isn’t a Big Deal

Multiband fan verticals are popular antennas among HF operators who want a no-tuner, single-feed solution that covers multiple bands. Whether you're chasing DX on 20 meters or checking into a net on 40, a well-designed fan vertical can get the job done. But there’s a recurring concern that often comes up in forums and coffee chats:

"What about mutual coupling between the vertical elements?"

In this article, we’ll break down what mutual coupling is, and why, in practical terms, it’s really not that big of a deal.

What’s a Fan Vertical, Really?

A fan vertical consists of multiple quarter-wave vertical elements, each cut for a different band, all connected at a single feedpoint. They "fan out" upward or outward from a shared base, typically with a shared radial field. Each element is tuned to its own band, and the idea is simple: when you're transmitting on, say, 20 meters, the 20-meter element resonates, while the others appear largely reactive and don’t significantly interact.

This works remarkably well in practice. Even though the other elements are physically close, they behave like open stubs or high-impedance elements on the active band.

The Mutual Coupling Concern

Mutual coupling is the interaction between adjacent elements where energy from one induces current in another. On paper, this sounds like it should ruin the SWR or distort the radiation pattern. In reality, the effects are minimal for most fan verticals used by amateurs.

Why?

1. Spacing and detuning: The non-resonant elements are off-frequency enough that they don't efficiently re-radiate energy.
2. High impedance at non-resonant frequencies: An element that isn’t resonant on the operating frequency often presents a high impedance, so little energy is absorbed or re-radiated.
3. Real-world construction tolerances: Variations in angle, length, and mounting actually help prevent problematic resonances.

Performance Near Resonance

Even when you're slightly off the resonant point of an element (say, 14.050 MHz when your 20m leg is cut for 14.200), the antenna still works, and your tuner handles the match. This "close enough" performance band is typically forgiving.

• The dominant element still carries most of the current.
• Coupling into non-resonant legs is minimal and does not seriously affect tuning.
• SWR curves may shift slightly, but usually not outside the range a typical tuner can handle.

What About Close Bands Like 17m and 20m?

Adjacent bands like 17 meters and 20 meters (or 10m and 12m) are indeed closer in both physical length and frequency, which increases the potential for interaction. But in practical builds, the effects are still manageable:

• Minor Detuning Can Occur — A 17m element may slightly shift the resonant point of a 20m element, but this usually just shifts the SWR dip a little.
• Dominant Current Still Flows Where It Should — The intended element always carries the most current.
• A Bit of Physical Separation Helps — Fanning the elements at slightly different angles or spacing the tips 20–30 cm apart often eliminates measurable effects.
• Trimming Is Rarely Necessary — As long as SWR dips are near the band of interest, modern tuners match easily. Don’t obsess over textbook resonance — focus on operating.

In short: close band interactions are real but minor. They're easy to tame with careful layout, and if the dips are in the right neighborhood, the tuner will take care of the rest.

Cutting to Resonance Can Skew Your Radiation Angle

When you trim an element to achieve a perfect SWR dip, you’re also slightly shifting its electrical length away from the ideal quarter-wave (λ/4). While this may improve impedance matching, it can inadvertently affect the antenna’s radiation angle. Particularly with mutual coupling at play, small shifts in resonance points may tempt you to over-trim. But keep in mind: a λ/4 vertical radiates best when it’s close to that quarter-wave relationship, not just when the analyzer shows 1:1. If a band settles around 3:1 SWR but maintains good electrical length, you’re better off using a tuner than forcing the element shorter. Prioritize radiating length over chasing textbook SWR — it’s the wavelength that controls takeoff angle and DX potential, not just the return loss graph.

A Word on SWR and Performance

Many hams focus heavily on SWR, but it's important to understand that SWR is not a measure of how well an antenna radiates. It is simply an indicator of how efficiently power is transferred from the transmitter to the antenna without a tuner.

With a tuner in place, the transmitter sees a proper load, and even if the SWR at the antenna feedpoint is not ideal, the system can still radiate effectively. As long as losses in feedline and matching components are low, overall performance remains excellent.

Interested in more technical content? Subscribe to our updates for deep-dive RF articles and lab notes.

Questions or experiences to share? Feel free to contact RF.Guru.