Non-Resonant Passive RX Antennas and Common Mode: Why It Still Matters
When working with receive-only antennas, many assume that resonance and impedance don't matter much. While it's true that SWR isn't critical in RX setups, common mode current (CMC) and feedpoint impedance (especially reactive components) still significantly influence noise pickup and overall performance — not directly, but by creating the conditions that make common mode coupling more likely.
Passive RX Antennas: When Return Paths Go Rogue
In passive quarter-wave RX antennas:
- A non-resonant length results in a complex impedance at the feedpoint.
- This increases the voltage at the feedpoint relative to the current.
- In an unbalanced system (no radials (or non resonant), poor ground), this voltage is also seen between the center conductor and the shield.
Because there's no defined return path, the coax shield becomes part of the current loop. It now sits at a shifted RF potential relative to the environment, making it vulnerable to common mode noise pickup.
This isn’t because the return current is noisy — it’s because the shield is now a floating conductor exposed to electric fields, especially in the near field of power supplies, routers, and home electronics.
The potential difference between the shield and its surroundings allows common mode energy to ride on that imbalance, turning the shield into a second, unintended receiving structure. The lack of a clear outbound current return path only worsens this, as the system cannot contain or define where return current flows.
So What Actually Picks Up the Noise?
It’s not the antenna — it’s the coax shield.
That shield is now:
- Electrically energized relative to its environment
- Physically long and often routed near noisy sources
- Lacking isolation from the receiver input
This makes it a perfect receptor for noise via common mode induction — especially from power supplies, LED drivers, Ethernet cables, and similar sources.
Why the Choke Saves the Day
A common mode choke doesn’t fix the impedance mismatch — but it stops the shield from acting like a second antenna:
- It presents high impedance to current trying to flow on the outside of the coax.
- It maintains the proper differential geometry of the coax (signal on the center conductor, return on the inside of the shield).
- It prevents voltage differences between the shield and the environment from turning into noise current.
This is exactly why chokes matter in receive-only systems — not because you're transmitting, but because they enforce proper current paths and eliminate the exposed “pickup wire” effect of the shield.
Active Antennas: Forced Match, But Still Need Discipline
Active RX antennas are usually designed with an internal impedance match (e.g., 50 Ω or 75 Ω output), so the receiver sees a nice clean load. However:
- The front-end amplifier still sees the antenna’s real voltage swing, which can be large if the antenna is non-resonant.
- If there's no internal choke or transformer isolation, that same shield energizing problem occurs.
Well-designed active antennas include:
- Isolation transformers or baluns at the input
- Proper RF decoupling at the bias-T
- Choking or filtering of common mode paths inside the housing
Key Takeaways
- Complex impedance doesn't cause noise, but it raises RF voltage.
- In unbalanced systems, that voltage appears across the coax shield.
- The shield becomes an antenna for common mode noise pickup.
- A choke prevents shield currents, keeps return paths inside, and makes your system behave.
Just because you're not transmitting doesn’t mean you can ignore geometry and return current. If your antenna has no clear return path, the coax braid will take over — and become your worst listener.
Interested in more technical content like this? Subscribe to our notification list — we only send updates when new articles or blogs are published: https://listmonk.rf.guru/subscription/form
Questions or experiences to share? Feel free to contact RF.Guru or join our feedback group!
Written by Joeri Van Dooren, ON6URE – RF, electronics and software engineer, complex platform and antenna designer. Founder of RF.Guru. An expert in active and passive antennas, high-power RF transformers, and custom RF solutions, he has also engineered telecom and broadcast hardware, including set-top boxes, transcoders, and E1/T1 switchboards. His expertise spans high-power RF, embedded systems, digital signal processing, and complex software platforms, driving innovation in both amateur and professional communications industries.