TermiLoop vs Other Terminated Antennas: A Practical Comparison

Terminated antennas offer simplicity: broad frequency coverage, reduced sensitivity to height, and less need for external tuners. But not all designs perform equally well. In this article, we compare the TermiLoop™ to commonly used terminated antennas like the BBTD, T2FD, and commercial broadband systems such as the B&W BWD-90.

What is the TermiLoop?

The TermiLoop is a terminated, folded off-center-fed wire antenna with a matched 4:1 UNUN at the feedpoint and a non-inductive terminating resistor near the far end. It is designed to operate from 160 to 10 meters, and becomes effectively tunable with most internal tuners when installed at heights over 5 meters above ground and only 14 to 6 m wide.

  • On 160, 80, and 60 meters, it supports NVIS-type coverage
  • On 40 to 10 meters, it performs similarly to an off-center-fed antenna with a low-angle DX pattern

The basic version is rated for 100 W FT8 and 250 W SSB, while a higher-power version is available, rated for 800 W FT8 and 1.5 kW SSB.

Comparison Table

Antenna Type Folded Geometry Feedpoint Type Terminated Multiband QRO Capable Efficiency (80m) Pattern Use
TermiLoop Yes Off-center + 4:1 UNUN Yes Yes Yes (up to 1.5 kW SSB / 600 W FT8) Moderate to good NVIS + DX hybrid
T2FD Yes Symmetric + 4:1 Yes Yes Sometimes Low to moderate NVIS only
BBTD No Symmetric + 9:1 Yes Yes No Low NVIS only
B&W BWD-90 (BBTA) No Symmetric + 4:1 Yes Yes Limited Low Broad NVIS

Notes on Other Designs

T2FD (Tilted Terminated Folded Dipole)

  • Developed for shortwave NVIS applications
  • Efficiency generally remains low, especially on lower bands
  • Choking is often required to suppress common-mode currents
  • Not typically intended for digital modes or long-duty-cycle use

BBTD (Broadband Terminated Dipole)

  • Designed for coverage without tuning, but with high resistive losses
  • Uses a 9:1 UNUN and a terminating resistor typically between 450–600 Ω
  • Easy to match, but substantial power is lost as heat, especially on lower bands

B&W BWD-90

  • Commercial solution aiming at broad HF coverage
  • Known for consistent impedance but limited in radiated efficiency
  • Suited for shortwave listening or NVIS voice operation rather than efficient transmission

Why the TermiLoop Differs

  1. Broad Compatibility: Tunable with internal tuner from 160 to 10 meters when installed properly
  2. Matched UNUN: Uses a 4:1 ratio tailored to expected line impedance
  3. Folded Geometry: Improves current distribution and reduces loss resistance
  4. Configurable Power Levels: Basic version supports typical 100 W-class transceivers; high-power version supports 600 W FT8 or 1.5 kW SSB
  5. Dual-Pattern Operation: Supports both high-angle and low-angle propagation depending on band

Conclusion

The TermiLoop provides a more balanced approach to broadband operation. While all terminated designs involve trade-offs, careful attention to geometry, impedance, and installation height significantly improves real-world performance compared to older terminated dipole concepts.

Mini-FAQ

  • Is the TermiLoop efficient? — More efficient than classic BBTD and BWD-90 designs, but still lower than a resonant dipole.
  • Does it need a tuner? — Most radios’ internal tuners handle it fine across 160–10 m.
  • Can I run digital modes? — Yes, up to 100 W on the standard model or 800 W FT8 on the high-power model.
  • What about NVIS vs DX? — Lower bands support NVIS; higher bands favor low-angle DX propagation.

Interested in more technical content? Subscribe to our updates for deep-dive RF articles and lab notes.

Questions or experiences to share? Feel free to contact RF.Guru.

Joeri Van Dooren, ON6URE – RF engineer, antenna designer, and founder of RF.Guru, specializing in high-performance HF/VHF antennas and RF components.