The Autotransformer (Voltage Unun transformer) explained
The Autotransformer (Voltage UNUN Transformer) is a voltage-mode impedance matching transformer designed to efficiently match unbalanced loads to unbalanced sources. Unlike current-mode devices such as Guanella baluns, autotransformers operate in voltage mode, providing highly effective impedance transformation but lacking common-mode suppression in standard single-wire winding configurations. However, when wound bifilar or trifilar, they can exhibit some level of common-mode rejection, improving RF performance in practical installations.
Key Characteristics of an Autotransformer (Voltage UNUN)
- Type: Voltage transformer (UNUN – Unbalanced to Unbalanced)
- Purpose: Impedance transformation in unbalanced RF systems
- Core Concept: A single tapped winding on ferrite core
- Common Ratios: 4:1, 9:1, 12:1
- Best For: End-fed antennas, random wires, EFHW matching
How the Autotransformer (UNUN) Works
- Primary and secondary share a winding, with taps setting the ratio
- Voltage transformation occurs via inductive coupling
- Efficient for step-up/step-down matching, but does not enforce current balance
- Additional ferrite chokes often required to control common-mode currents
- Bifilar or trifilar winding improves CMR and reduces leakage inductance
Enhancing Common-Mode Rejection
Single-wire wound autotransformers are prone to common-mode currents, but by twisting bifilar or trifilar conductors on the core, tight magnetic coupling is achieved. This improves noise rejection, lowers leakage inductance, and provides some suppression of common-mode RF without sacrificing efficiency. This makes such designs valuable in high-power HF systems where both impedance matching and noise control are required.
Common Autotransformer Types
4:1 Autotransformer UNUN
- Purpose: Match 200 Ω antennas (e.g., OCF dipoles, verticals) to 50 Ω
- Construction: Single tapped winding on ferrite core
- Note: May require an external choke for common-mode control
9:1 Autotransformer UNUN
- Purpose: Match 450–900 Ω random wires or EFHW to 50 Ω
- Effect: Efficient but needs counterpoises or grounding to avoid RF feedback
- Limitation: Can exhibit common-mode resonance unless choked
12:1 Autotransformer UNUN
- Purpose: Match very high impedance wires (600–1200 Ω) to 50 Ω
- Limitation: Higher ratios increase risk of RF feedback and grounding sensitivity
Autotransformer vs Guanella vs Ruthroff
Feature | Autotransformer (Voltage UNUN) | Guanella (Current Mode) | Ruthroff (Voltage Mode) |
---|---|---|---|
Type | Voltage transformer | Current transformer | Voltage transformer |
Impedance Ratios | 4:1, 9:1, 12:1 | 1:1, 4:1, 9:1 | 1:1, 4:1, 9:1 |
CMC Suppression | No (unless bifilar/trifilar) | Yes | No |
CMR Issues | Possible | No | No |
Construction | Single tapped winding | Parallel transmission lines | Tapped or autotransformer |
Efficiency | High | Lossier at higher ratios | High, but no CMC suppression |
Best For | EFHW, random wires | Dipoles, loops, OCF | Windoms, EFHW |
When to Use an Autotransformer
- For end-fed or random wire antennas needing impedance matching
- When voltage transformation is the main requirement
- Where a simple, efficient solution is preferred
- With bifilar/trifilar winding for improved CMR
- When common-mode issues can be controlled separately with a choke
Final Takeaway
Autotransformer UNUNs provide efficient impedance matching for end-fed and random wire antennas. They are simpler and more efficient than Guanella transformers, but do not inherently suppress common-mode currents. Adding bifilar or trifilar windings improves their performance, but external chokes are often still required. Careful grounding and layout help avoid common-mode resonance effects. For many HF setups, they remain the most effective and compact solution.
Mini-FAQ
- Do autotransformers suppress RF on the coax? — No, unless wound bifilar/trifilar or paired with a choke.
- Is a 9:1 UNUN good for random wires? — Yes, but grounding and counterpoises are essential.
- When should I choose Guanella instead? — When common-mode suppression is more critical than efficiency.
Interested in more technical content? Subscribe to our updates for deep-dive RF articles and lab notes: Subscribe here
Questions or experiences to share? Feel free to contact RF.Guru.