Wait… Aren’t Those the Same Antenna?

— Why Ham-Radio Antenna Names Cause So Much Confusion

If you’ve ever joined a club meeting or scrolled a forum and thought, “Wait — aren’t those two antennas the same thing?”, you’re not alone. Ham-radio antenna names are a stew of tradition, marketing, and half-remembered history. The result: identical names can describe different designs, and wildly different names can point to nearly identical radiators. This guide untangles the worst offenders and gives you a framework to decode any antenna name you see online or at the swap meet.

A Simple Framework to Cut Through the Noise

Before tackling specific examples, keep this five-part mental checklist. Almost every antenna misunderstanding vanishes when you can answer these questions:

• Geometry: What’s the physical shape? (straight wire, loop, vertical, array)
• Feedpoint: Where — and how — is it fed? (center, off-center, end; balanced vs. unbalanced)
• Electrical length: How long is the radiator in wavelengths on the band of interest? (¼λ, ½λ, 5/8λ, or broadband)
• Matching method: What keeps the transmitter happy? (1:1 choke, 4:1 / 9:1 transformer, J-stub, tuner, resistive load)
• Environment/ground: What does it work against? (radials, counterpoise, earth, tower, feedline)

If the name doesn’t answer those five questions, it’s marketing — not engineering.

The Usual Suspects: Names That Trip People Up

1) Windom vs OCF Dipole vs Carolina Windom

• Original Windom (1920s): Single-wire off-center feed using the feedline and ground as part of the return.
• Modern OCF Dipole: Two-wire dipole fed off-center (typically 33/67 %) through a 4:1 current balun to coax — not the original Windom, though many still call it one.
• Carolina Windom: OCF variant with a “vertical radiator” section of coax between two chokes to add some vertical polarization.

Decode: Two-wire or single-wire? What balun ratio? Where are the chokes?
Modern variants often use a 4:1 unun followed by a current choke. If two radiators (main + counterpoise) are present, the choke sits 20–50 cm after the unun; if only one radiator, the choke moves farther away, letting the coax serve as counterpoise.

2) EFHW vs “End-Fed Random Wire”

• EFHW (End-Fed Half-Wave): Radiator ≈ ½ λ (or multiples). High-Z feedpoint (2–3 kΩ) matched via 49:1 or 64:1 transformer + choke; harmonically related bands work without retuning.
• End-Fed Random Wire (EFRW): Length chosen to avoid tuner current peaks — not a half-wave. Uses tuner + 9:1 unun + counterpoise.

Decode: If it’s not a half-wave on at least one band, it’s not an EFHW.

3) Zepp vs J-Pole vs Slim Jim

• Zepp (End-Fed Zepp): ½ λ radiator fed by open-wire line — named for airship stations.
• J-Pole: ½ λ radiator matched by ¼ λ shorted stub (“J” shape). Needs a choke to control feedline radiation.
• Slim Jim: Folded J-Pole variant with slightly different pattern claims but same family.

Decode: Matching stub present? Then it’s a J-type. No stub? Likely a Zepp-style feed.

4) G5RV and Friends

• G5RV: ~102 ft dipole + specific ladder-line section + coax. Needs a tuner for multiband use.
• G5RV Jr., ZS6BKW, etc.: Re-optimized matching sections for modern bands.

Decode: Fixed-length ladder-line section between dipole and coax = G5RV family. Not a miracle no-tuner antenna — just a clever doublet match.

5) “Longwire”

• Originally: A wire several wavelengths long (a traveling-wave antenna).
• Now: Often used for any end-fed wire — ambiguous and misleading.

Decode: Ask for length and whether a tuner + counterpoise are used. “Longwire” alone means nothing.

6) Ground Plane vs Vertical vs 5/8-Wave

• ¼ λ Ground Plane: Vertical + radials. Simple, efficient, omnidirectional.
• ½ λ Vertical: High feed impedance, no radials theoretically needed, but matching network and choke still critical.
• 5/8 λ Vertical: Requires matching network; offers slightly lower takeoff angle when well grounded.

Decode: Length and radial configuration define it. A “ground plane” without radials isn’t one.

7) “Magnetic Loop” vs Loop

• Small Transmitting Loop (STL): Circumference ≪ λ, high-Q, tuned via variable capacitor; magnetic-field dominated.
• Full-Wave / Delta / Quad Loop: Perimeter ≈ 1 λ or multiples; behaves like a wire antenna with broader bandwidth.

Decode: Needs a capacitor and razor-thin bandwidth? STL. Large polygon of wire? Standard loop.

8) NVIS Antenna

NVIS is a propagation technique, not a specific antenna. A low horizontal radiator (0.1–0.2 λ above ground) launches high angles for regional coverage.

Decode: An “NVIS antenna” simply means an antenna installed for NVIS propagation.

9) T2FD (Tilted Terminated Folded Dipole)

A folded dipole with a resistive termination to broaden bandwidth and tame SWR. Excellent for monitoring and ALE, but not a high-efficiency TX choice.

Decode: Resistor across far end + transformer feed = T2FD.

10) “Beam” vs Yagi vs LPDA vs Quad

• Beam: Generic term for any directional antenna.
• Yagi-Uda: One driven element + parasitic reflector(s)/director(s).
• LPDA: Many elements of varying length fed in sequence; wide bandwidth.
• Quad/Delta Loop Beam: Loop elements instead of open dipoles.

Decode: All elements fed = log-periodic. One fed + parasitics = Yagi. Loop elements = Quad family.

11) “Double Bazooka” (Coaxial Dipole)

Dipole made from coax sections; claims extra bandwidth but still a ½ λ dipole with minor SWR broadening.

Decode: Treat as dipole — no miracle gain.

12) Balun vs Unun vs Choke

• Balun: BALanced ↔ UNbalanced converter (1:1, 4:1, etc.) — job defines it, not ratio.
• Unun: UNbalanced ↔ UNbalanced transformer (e.g., 9:1 for EFRW).
• Choke (1:1 Current Balun): Suppresses common-mode current on feedline — critical for end-fed and vertical designs.

Decode: Balanced or unbalanced feed? Need ratio or just a choke?

13) dBi vs dBd (and the “Isotropic” Myth)

dBi: Gain referenced to a theoretical isotropic point source.
dBd: Gain referenced to a ½ λ dipole (0 dBd ≈ 2.15 dBi).

Decode: Always compare like with like — and remember, no one has built an isotropic antenna yet.

Why the Confusion Refuses to Die

• Historical drift: Early names stuck even as designs evolved (Windom → OCF).
• Marketing: Phrases like “All-band” or “No radials” sell better than “needs a good choke.”
• Club shorthand: Nicknames omit key details like balun ratio or radial count.
• Installation context: Soil, height, and coax routing can change behavior more than the name itself.

How to Decode Any Antenna You See Online

Run this 10-point checklist before you build or buy:

1. Band(s) and length vs target band(s)
2. Feedpoint (center/off-center/end; balanced/unbalanced)
3. Matching hardware (choke, transformer, stub, capacitor)
4. Radials / counterpoise (requirements)
5. Height & orientation (in wavelengths, not feet)
6. Intended pattern (DX low-angle, NVIS, omni)
7. Bandwidth & power expectations
8. Environment (soil, roof, metal, attic)
9. Common-mode control (choke placement & mix)
10. Trade-offs acknowledged in docs or marketing

Typical Feed Behaviors (Ballpark)

• ½ λ dipole (center-fed): ~73 Ω balanced → 1:1 current balun for coax.
• OCF dipole (~33/67 %): few hundred Ω; 4:1 balun; expect higher-band lobes.
• EFHW: 2–3 kΩ; 49:1 / 64:1 transformer + choke; short counterpoise helps.
• ¼ λ vertical: ~35–50 Ω with 3–4 radials; more radials = better efficiency.
• 5/8 λ vertical: needs matching network; lower takeoff angle if grounded well.
• Small loop: very high current; narrow bandwidth; tune precisely and stay clear.

(Typical values only — real-world results vary by height, soil, and installation.)

Better Naming Makes Better Radio

When describing an antenna, use a one-line “spec sentence” instead of relying on its nickname. Example:

“40 m OCF dipole, 66 ft total, feedpoint at 33/67 %, 4:1 current balun to 50 Ω coax, choke at the balun, apex 35 ft, ends 20 ft, covers 80/40/20/10 m with tuner.”

That single line conveys more useful information than any label ever could.

Final Thoughts

Antenna names are convenience labels, not definitions. Whenever a name leaves you guessing, return to the five-part framework — geometry, feedpoint, length, match, and environment. Once you do, the fog lifts: you’ll make better choices, set realistic expectations, and get on the air with fewer surprises.

Interested in more technical content? Subscribe to our updates for deep-dive RF articles and lab notes.

Questions or experiences to share? Contact RF.Guru — we love real-world feedback.