QRP Z-Match vs. QRP Autotuner with Doublet and 600 Ohm Open Wire: Is a Z-Match More Efficient?

A common question among QRP and field operators is whether a manual Z-Match tuner is more efficient than a QRP automatic tuner like the Icom AH-705. The answer depends heavily on the setup—especially the tuner’s location, the quality of components used, and how common-mode currents are handled.

The Antenna Setup

We consider a typical center-fed doublet antenna fed with 600-ohm open wire (ladder line). Two tuning solutions are compared:

  • QRP AH-705 Autotuner, used with a high-performance wideband 1:1 current balun at the feedpoint.
  • QRP Z-Match manual tuner, capable of matching balanced lines directly, covering 80–10m.

With the AH-705 mounted at the antenna feedpoint, using a low-loss PTFE-based 1:1 balun (insertion loss < 0.07 dB, 9 kW ICAS rating), the comparison becomes very close.

Efficiency and Practical Performance Comparison

1. Tuner Location

  • When tuners are placed at the shack, feedline losses can be significant due to high SWR on the 600-ohm open wire.
  • When tuners are placed at the antenna feedpoint, feedline losses are minimized. In this configuration, both the AH-705 and Z-Match operate efficiently.

2. Balun Loss and Power Transfer

  • Our PTFE-based wideband balun introduces less than 0.07 dB loss across 1–30 MHz, equating to only ~1.6% power loss.
  • This loss is often lower than the internal losses in many Z-Match designs, especially under high-reactance conditions.

3. Matching Range

  • AH-705: Wide range, including 160m.
  • QRP Z-Match: Typically limited to 80–10m.

4. Tuning Convenience

  • AH-705: Automatic, fast, hands-free.
  • Z-Match: Manual, slower, requires operator skill.

5. Common-Mode Rejection (CMR) — The Hidden Factor

  • Even if a Z-Match is fully balanced in design, without a 1:1 current balun or choke, it offers no effective suppression of common-mode currents. This can lead to significant noise pickup, especially from vertical structures, coax shields, or local SMP (switch-mode power supply) sources.
  • A tuner with no balun can still suffer from noise and unpredictable behavior.
  • The AH-705, when paired with our high-quality balun, includes excellent CMR, dramatically lowering receive noise.
  • If a balun is added to both systems (Z-Match and AH-705), CMR performance becomes equivalent, and so does overall noise rejection.

6. Quantitative Efficiency Difference

In this optimized configuration (tuner at the feedpoint + low-loss balun + 600-ohm open wire), the Z-Match offers at best a 0.05 to 0.1 dB improvement in certain narrow conditions, which is negligible in practical terms. Once both systems include proper CMR handling (via a balun), performance is equal from both an efficiency and noise perspective.

It is worth noting that during on-air comparisons, the Z-Match can show up to ½ S-point better signal levels on SSB reception under ideal conditions. This equates to approximately 1.5–2 dB advantage, typically due to slightly lower insertion loss. However, in a contest or fast-paced field operation, the tuning speed, automation, and frequency agility of the AH-705 often outweigh this small gain.

Conclusion

With our high-end PTFE balun and AH-705 tuner installed at the antenna feedpoint, and using a doublet with 600-ohm open wire feedline, the efficiency is so close to a Z-Match that there’s no practical benefit to using a Z-Match in most scenarios. The AH-705 offers greater frequency coverage, automation, and flexibility, while delivering equivalent or better noise performance when paired with a proper balun.

Unless there’s a specific reason to go fully manual (e.g. ultralight operations or minimalist setups), the Z-Match no longer holds a significant efficiency or noise advantage in this context.

Interested in more technical content like this? Subscribe to our notification list — we only send updates when new articles or blogs are published: https://listmonk.rf.guru/subscription/form

Questions or experiences to share? Feel free to contact RF.Guru or join our feedback group!

Written by Joeri Van Dooren, ON6URE – RF, electronics and software engineer, complex platform and antenna designer. Founder of RF.Guru. An expert in active and passive antennas, high-power RF transformers, and custom RF solutions, he has also engineered telecom and broadcast hardware, including set-top boxes, transcoders, and E1/T1 switchboards. His expertise spans high-power RF, embedded systems, digital signal processing, and complex software platforms, driving innovation in both amateur and professional communications industries.