Yagi Antennas: Common Mode Listening Machines

Last updated: August 22, 2025.

Yagi‑Uda antennas deliver excellent forward gain (≈6–13 dBi, element‑count dependent) and narrow E‑plane beamwidths (≈30°–60°). Yet in real‑world HF/VHF stations they’re often superb common‑mode (CM) pickup systems unless you actively suppress CM currents. Uncontrolled CM turns the feedline, boom hardware, and mast into unintended sensors and radiators—raising the noise floor, warping patterns, and killing F/B where it matters most.

Why Yagis Are So Susceptible

Yagis are usually fed unbalanced (coax) into a structure that wants balanced currents. Any imbalance at the feedpoint drives CM on the outside of the coax and everything it touches.

• Element geometry & coupling: Tight parasitic coupling intensifies sensitivity to small asymmetries; nearby metal “talks back.”
• Asymmetric installation: A coax drop down one side, a boom‑to‑mast plate, or an off‑center balun all inject imbalance.
• Metallic surroundings: Rotators, masts, and towers provide capacitive/inductive return paths for CM.
• Long feedlines: Electrically long, unchoked coax becomes a very capable receive antenna at HF/6 m.

“Balanced vs unbalanced” isn’t a moral story—it’s where unintended current can (and will) flow when you give it a path.

Common Mode vs Differential Mode

Differential mode is the intended TEM wave inside the coax; fields are confined. Common mode rides the outer shield surface against “ground,” freely coupling to the environment like a random wire. Consequences:

• Unpredictable pattern distortion and false lobes
• Raised receive noise floor (local hash couples onto the feedline)
• Degraded F/B and skewed bearing indications

Where the Problem Bites Hardest

• HF (3–30 MHz): Coax runs are often 0.2–0.8 λ; CM easily resonates somewhere in‑band.
• 50 MHz (6 m): Still very sensitive; many ignore chokes here and pay in noise and skewed patterns.
• VHF 144 MHz+: Less severe (shorter electrical lines), but stacks/long runs can still exhibit CM issues.

Ineffective (or Misunderstood) Mitigations

• “Double‑shielded coax blocks ferrites.” Myth. Ferrites act on the outermost surface current. Foil+braid or double braid does not make chokes ineffective; it may slightly change required turns to reach a target Z_CM.
• “Ground the shack end and you’re done.” CM often originates at the antenna. A station ground won’t cure a feedpoint imbalance 20–40 m away.
• Voltage baluns fix CM. Voltage (Ruthroff) transformers match impedance but do not provide high CM impedance. You need a current (Guanella) solution.

Proper Mitigation Techniques

1) High‑Z_CM Current Choke at the Feedpoint

• Use a true current balun/choke with Z_CM ≥ 5 kΩ at band center (≥10 kΩ preferred for multi‑band robustness).
• Stack ferrite sleeves (Mix 31 or 43 at HF; 31 excels ≤20 MHz; 43 good into 6 m). Verify with measured Z_CM data where possible.
• Coax‑through‑toroid windings are compact and effective; avoid sharp bends and keep windings tight.

2) Feedline Geometry and Exit

• Drop the coax at 90° to the plane of the elements for at least ~0.25 λ before any bend.
• Keep the first meters of coax clear of the boom, tower, and other metalwork.

3) Strategic Secondary Chokes

• On long runs, add a secondary choke ~0.5 λ (electrical) downline to suppress standing CM. Remember the cable’s velocity factor when placing it.

4) Balanced/Isolated Feeds (Advanced)

• Transformer‑isolated or truly balanced feeds can further reduce CM ingress, especially on multi‑band arrays.

Conclusion

Yagis deliver gain, but without CM control they also deliver noise and pattern chaos. Treat the feedpoint with a high‑Z_CM choke, route the coax cleanly, and add secondary chokes where needed. Otherwise, your high‑gain beam becomes a high‑gain listening machine for local junk.

Interested in more technical content? Subscribe to our updates for deep‑dive RF articles and lab notes.

Questions or experiences to share? Feel free to contact RF.Guru.